Monday, September 28, 2009

Are your medical records still confidential in a divorce case?

The short answer is maybe not. A California appellate court ruled on this issue last week in Manela v. Superior Court, No. B21447. In that action, the parties were in the middle of a dissolution action that included a dispute over child custody. One party moved to quash subpoenas related to their medical records arguing that they were protected by doctor-patient privilege. The lower court had agreed and had, in fact, quashed the subpoenas. But the appellate court reversed the decision ruling that the constitutional right to privacy regarding medical records is not absolute and the party's privacy interests are outweighed by the state's compelling interest in protecting the child's best interests.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Dependency Case Law Update

Dependency law is a sub-category of family law. Actually some would say it is a quasi-criminal quasi-civil category on its own. This type of case is where child abuse or neglect is alleged, usually by the State (the Department of Children and Families [DCF]), but not necessarily. Chapter 39 of the Florida Statutes governs these matters.

An interesting new case is this area was published as a result of an appeal this year in the 5th District Court of Appeal. In B.T. v. D.C.F., the child at issue was adjudicated dependent based on a finding that the Father had abandoned him. The Father was incarcerated since before the birth of child and was not scheduled to be released until 2011. At the time of the hearing the child was 5 years old. The Father was the only witness at the hearing. He testified that he regularly received photos and updates about the child from family members, and that his failure to pay child support was due solely to his incarceration. The appellate court upheld the adjudication of dependency but held that the finding of abandonment was not supported by the evidence. The Court stated that the Department of Children & Families had presented no evidence other than incarceration to support a finding of abandonment and that incarceration alone was insufficient to support the finding of abandonment. The Court states in its opinion that "We do not suggest that [the child] was not abandoned by Father; merely that there was a failure of proof of abandonment."

This case is a reminder of the key in preparing proper evidence and testimony even where the end result may seem obvious.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Law Office Location

Our office is located in the heart of Pinellas County at 801 West Bay Drive in the Wachovia Bank Building. (Pictured above.) It is only minutes from the downtown civil courthouse in Clearwater where most of our cases are heard. It is also located in the same community where I and my staff live so we are familiar with the schools, organizations and activities here in Largo and the surrounding towns. The picture shown here was taken today on a typical Florida morning. It's sunny, warm and a little on the muggy side. While I doubt you will have any trouble finding us, do not hesitate to call us at (727) 584-2528 if need be.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

How old does my son have to be to decide which parent he lives with?

This is probably the most common question I get asked regarding custody issues. The short answer is 18. In Florida there is no age at which a child gets to decide who they live with. The child's preference, if they are deemed of sufficient age and maturity, is just one of 20+ factors the Court looks at when making a custody decision. Apparently there are some states where when a child turns 13 (or some other certain age) they do get to decide. Florida law is directly contrary to that.